Monday, January 20, 2025

Blood Journal Snippets

 Vol 142 Dec 2023

1. Familial platelet disorder with associated myeloid malignancies

-RUNX1 mutation

- associated GI symptoms and allergy symptoms in a high percentage

-AML, MDS, CMML,  ALL, Smoldering myeloma

-plt study may show findings similar to aspirin effect

-3/4 pt had bone marrow dysmegakaryopoiesis


2. Gene therapy for Sickle Cell ( March 2024)

Exa-cel uses gene editing to infuse patient's own CD34positive HSC after pt has received myeloablative chemo. This is a  non viral cell therapy.

3. Arterial occlusive disease is increased with ponatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib. Not with imatinib, and probably not with bosutinib. These include MI, TIA, PAD. ( March 2024)

4. Transfusion threshold in adults with thalassemia ( March 2024)- maintain Hb > 10.5 gm. There is a 9% improvement in survival compared to those with Hb  less than 10 gm.

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Myelofibrosis

 Initial assessment

  1. Age: less than 70 yr or > 70 yr
  2. Disease specific symptoms and comorbidities: night sweats, fever, wt loss, itching, fatigue, Early satiety
  3. Disease associated comorbidities: pulm HTN, portal HTN, portal vein thrombosis, VTE, thrombocytopenia, anemia
  4. Transfusion needs
  5. Iron overload yes or no
  6. Other unrelated comorbidities: Cardiac, 
  7. Spleen size: 
  8. Driver mutations: CALR/MPL are good in transplant eligible. ASXL1 and related high risk mutations(IDH1/2, EZH2, SRSF2) as a whole have no impact on HSCT. ASXL1 and TP53 multihit status are negative predictors. HSCT can overcome the negative effect of poor-risk cytogenetics so cytogenetics not included in the risk stratification. Patients carrying MPL mutation showed excellent 5-year survival of >80%
  9. MIPSS- R
Current consensus recommends HSCT for patients with MF with a DIPSS intermediate-2 and high-risk score and age <70 years.
Circulating blasts and anemia are not predictors of HSCT outcomes unless anemia is associated with iron overload. Spleen size can predict graft failure and delayed engraftment. Fibrosis can be reversed with HSCT in 90% cases by 6 months after HSCT.

We currently do not use any blast reduction therapy before HSCT for chronic-phase MF (<10% blasts), whereas investigational blast reduction can be considered in accelerated-phase MF to reduce risk for relapse.
Blast-phase transformation before HSCT represents the most feared complication in MF and its estimated incidence after 20 years is <10%. HSCT is the only option for significantly improved outcomes, showing a 3-year survival of ∼30%, whereas only 1% survived in the absence of HSCT.

Patients with high iron overload determined by high serum ferritin at time of HSCT, need deferasirox during conditioning to suppress the appearance of labile plasma iron in order to decrease free radicals, which may decrease the incidence of infection and organ toxicity Importantly, therapeutic drug monitoring is the key to facilitate a safe coadministration with busulfan, because deferasirox leads to a considerable increase in busulfan area under the curve.



Non transplant candidates with MF

Treatment decisions in MF are guided by the manifestations of the disease and the type/degree of cytopenias ; patients with symptoms or splenomegaly are candidates for JAKi.
proliferative MF--> Jakafi, fedratinib
Cytopenic MF- pacritinib, momelotinib

1. Symptomatic, and with plt > 50K:
Ruxolitinib was the first JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for intermediate or high-risk MF. It is effective in controlling splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, and has been shown to improve overall survival. The typical starting dose is based on platelet count: 20 mg twice daily for platelet counts >200 x 10^9/L, 15 mg twice daily for counts between 100-200 x 10^9/L, and 5 mg twice daily for counts between 50-100 x 10^9/L.
-spleen responses are dose dependent so use max dose as tolerated per plt
-main se: grade ≥3 (Gr 3/4) anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 42-45% and 8-13% of the patients in the COMFORT studies
-prediction tool for prognosis after 6 months on Jakafi www.rr6.eu
-Abrupt ruxolitinib discontinuation without administering another JAKi should be avoided to prevent a cytokine storm, particularly when spleen length is ≥10 cm.
 Gradual dose-tapering or symptom management with steroids is advisable if further JAKi therapy is not planned

-Fedratinib ( first line or second line) is another JAK2-selective inhibitor, approved for patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF, particularly those who are resistant or intolerant to ruxolitinib. It is administered at 400 mg once daily, with dose adjustments for adverse reactions and in patients with severe renal impairment. Prophylaxis with thiamine is required to prevent Wernicke's encephalopathy
-frontline MF patients with moderate thrombocytopenia (platelets 50-100x109 /L) can be treated with fedratinib without dose modifications. Furthermore, fedratinib may be considered in the frontline in patients with adequate blood counts and a history of skin cancer or widespread skin cancer prior to initiation of JAKi treatment.
-can start fedratinib 2nd line without washout when changing from ruxolitinib
- causes more GI side effects due to FLT3 inhibition ( rx with loperamide and ondansetron)
-60% GI se, 40% anemia, 20% low plt

2. Symptomatic plt less than 50K: 
Pacritinib is preferred for patients with severe thrombocytopenia (platelet counts <50 x 10^9/L) due to its less myelosuppressive profile. It is also effective in reducing splenomegaly and alleviating symptoms. Monitor for prolonged QTc, MACE, thrombosis, bleeding, GI toxicity, second malignancy

3. Role of momelotinib: if the main cytopenia is anemia, and plt are at least above 25K

4. When to use other agents:
- ven+aza: blast phase of MF
- danazol with or without prednisone: may improve anemia
-hydroxyurea: to reduce high counts.
-revlimid: MF with chromosome 5q del
-splenic radiation: for symptom control to sites of extra medullary hematopoiesis


Pearls in MF treatment

1. Splenectomy is not associated with improved outcomes and should be only done in refractory cytopenias. Surgical mortality is 10% and pts may develop compensatory liver enlargement and liver failure.
2. Avoid ESA in patients with significant splenomegaly as it can worsen splenomegaly.
3. Ruxolitinib 5 mg BID has lower efficacy when plt are low
4.  momelotinib as a second-line treatment after pacritinib of severe tpenia but consider it a frontline option for patients with platelets ≥25x109 /L and moderate/severe anemia, especially when anemia is the predominant cytopenia. 
5. In cases with co-existing thrombocytopenia and anemia, which occurs frequently, the choice depends on the most dominant cytopenia and the patient’s clinical manifestations.   
A/P
age-year-old male/female presented with ongoing constitutional symptoms  for *** months, weight loss (25 lb), decreased appetite, and early satiety. Physical exam showed splenomegaly (measurement) and hepatomegaly (*** cm) on palpation. Blood work revealed white blood cells (WBC)*** hemoglobin (Hb) ***, platelets ***, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)*** and peripheral blasts*** Diagnosis of primary MF was confirmed by BM biopsy; reticulin fibrosis was grade MF-2 /MF3 with occasional collagen fibers. Karyotype was diploid. Next generation sequencing detected JAK2 V617F with variant allele frequency (VAF)***. The Dynamic International Prognostic Score (DIPSS)20 was intermediate1/ intermediate-2/high, and the risk was *** based on the Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System 70-plus version 2 (MIPSS70-plus v.2)

  • Patient with symptomatic MF and proliferative blood counts: Ruxolitinib or fedratinib ( often 2L)
  • Patient with platelet counts 50-100x109 /L and Hb ≈10 g/dL: Rux, fedratinib or momelotinib
  • patients with platelets 25-50 x109 /L and higher Hb levels or patients requiring occasional RBC transfusions:pacritinib 
  • patients with platelets 25-50 x109 /L and moderate/severe anemia requiring frequent RBC transfusions, or patients who have poor tolerance to RBC transfusions, or other comorbidities (e.g., heart failure and difficulty in tolerating extra fluid volume):momelotinib 


Saturday, January 11, 2025

Immunotherapy neurological toxicity

 1. Grade the toxicity

2. Triage:  next day evaluation in clinic/ hospital admission/ICU

3. Initial investigations: cultures, inflammatory markers, hormone level, antibodies

4. Medication management: stop the immunotherapy, start steroids, need for antibiotic, antivirals

5. Specialist consultation : Typically if pt is sick to be in a hospital, then consult appropriate specialist


Toxicity grading 

Instrumental ADL ( if these are affected, it is at least grade 2): evaluation in clinic in 24-48 hr

  • Shopping, finance, communicating via email or phone, taking medications,  driving, taking public transportation, doing laundry, cleaning hom

Self care ADL ( typically grade 3)à ER or same day evaluatio

  • dressing, bathing, hygiene, eating, toileting, cooking, ability to move within the home without assistance or falls
Grade 4 toxicity: severe symptoms

Specialist consultation

Patients should be referred to a specialist when they experience toxicities of grade ≥3, if toxicities of any grade do not respond to steroid treatment, if toxicities require hospitalization or for selected lower-grade toxicities in which diagnosis or management advice is needed, such as neurological and rheumatological toxicities (eg, inflammatory arthritis not interfering with instrumental activities of daily living, mild pain with erythema, or joint swelling).


Neurological toxicity- permanently discontinue immunotherapy. Neurology consultation.

Conditions: Myasthenia gravis, GBS, peripheral neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, multiple sclerosis like presentation

Myasthenia:
  1. Work-up and evaluation: Acetylcholine receptor antibodies. If neg, and with neurology input MuSK and LPR4 antibodies. The absence of antibodies does not rule out the syndrome.
  2. Very important to consider 3M syndrome- myasthenia, myocarditis, myositis.
  3. Myositis work up-CK, aldolase, ESR, CRP
  4. Myocarditis work up- telemetry, EKG, Echo ( can be normal), troponin I and T, cardiac MRI
  5. Review and stop medications with known risk of worsening myasthenia: beta-blockers, IV magnesium, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and macrolide antibiotics
  6. MRI brain and spine, LP, paraneoplastic work up

Treatment
1. low dose Steroids: typical dose 1 mg/kg bwt except with myasthenia use lower dose of 0.5 mg/kg bwt
2. IVIG 2 gm/kg bwt daily 5 days or PLEX
3. Plasma exchange (PLEX)
4. Rituximab if refractory to IVIG or PLEX

 Given the high rate of fatality for patients who develop myasthenia gravis (20%) or myocarditis (17%), suspicion of one or more of these irAEs should prompt evaluation for all three.

GBS- Corticosteroids are usually not recommended for idiopathic GBS; however, in ICPi-related forms, a trial is reasonable (methylprednisolone 2 to 4 mg/kg/day), followed by slow steroid taper. Neuro checks. Monitor for autonomic dysfunction. Avoid opiates for pain.

Aseptic meningitis/ Encephalitis: IV acyclovir pending ruling out direct or paraneoplastic malignancy as the cause rather than ICP toxicity.

Uptodate is a great resource.

References: 

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9683636/

https://myasthenia.org/wp-content/uploads/Portals/0/MGFA%20Classification.pdf


Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Renal cell

 Adjuvant

1. Review path report

2. Assess comorbidities including contraindications for IO

3. Assess individual risk of recurrence UCLA risk calculator   FOX CHASE calculator


Keynote 564 trial:  Pembro offered OS and DFS benefits compared to placebo.

 The estimated overall survival at 48 months was 91.2% in the pembrolizumab group, as compared with 86.0% in the placebo group.

2nd line after 1st line TKI+IO: cabozantinib ( METEOR, CONTACT-03, CANTATA trials) , everolimus+ lenvatinib ( this can be used 3rd if pt gets cabozantinib second line)

3rd line: Belzutifan ( LITESPARK trial versus everolimus)

The LITESPARK-005 trial is a pivotal clinical study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of belzutifan in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had progressed following treatment with both a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This open-label, randomized, head-to-head trial included 746 patients who were randomized to receive either belzutifan or everolimus. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
The trial demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS for belzutifan compared to everolimus, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.90; one-sided p-value = 0.0008). The median PFS was 5.6 months in both treatment arms, but the Kaplan-Meier curves indicated nonproportional hazards. The confirmed objective response rate was 22% for belzutifan and 3.6% for everolimus. Although the OS results were not fully mature, there was a favorable trend for belzutifan (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-1.07).
Belzutifan was generally well-tolerated, with fewer drug discontinuations and interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events compared to everolimus. This trial led to the FDA's approval of belzutifan for patients with advanced RCC following prior treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Oligometastatic RCC

The study by Tang et al. published in The Lancet Oncology in 2021 evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of SBRT in deferring systemic therapy for patients with oligometastatic RCC. This single-arm, phase 2 trial included patients with five or fewer metastatic lesions who were treated with SBRT to all lesions. The study found that SBRT could effectively defer systemic therapy, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 22.7 months and a 1-year PFS rate of 64%.
Additionally, the study by Liu et al. in the World Journal of Urology in 2021 demonstrated that complete eradication of tumor burden with SBRT was associated with improved progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with oligometastatic RCC. The 1-year local control rate was 97.3%, and patients who received complete SBRT had significantly longer PFS and CSS compared to those who received no or incomplete SBRT

FH mutated papillary RCC stage 4- Erlotinib+ avastin
The KEYNOTE-B61 trial showed that it worked as a first-line treatment option for advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. There’s some evidence from a phase 2 single-arm trial on everolimus/lenvatinib, but not as much evidence as for other treatment options.

T cell lymphoma - Initial approach

 Initial assessment:

  • Symptoms: Fever, wt loss, night sweats, skin rash, itching
  • Exam: rash, adenopathy, cachexia,  HSM

Investigations:

1. Excisional nodal bx/ skn bx/GI bx

2. BMBX: look for hemophagocytosis

3. LP is suspected CNS involvement

4. Echo

5. PET

Disease specific

  1. Immunophenotyping
  2. Cytogenetics /FISH
  3. Targeted genome sequencing
  4. T cell clonality
Ann Arbor staging

ALK+ ALCL--> BV CHP
low or low intermediate IPI PTCL--> CHOEP
MEITL and Hepatosplenic--> ICE
EATL= CHOEP followed by ASCT or Newcastle regimen
Adult T cell leukemia- rx of HTLV with antivirals and also VCAP-AMP-VECP 
NK cell--> SMILE regimen


Primary CNS lymphoma

 Reference: Annals of Oncology  June 2024 ESMO guidelines Diagnosis  Recommendations • Contrast-enhanced cranial MRI is the recommended imag...